<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Bradford Facts</title><description>Independent fact-checks of public statements made online by Brad Bradford, Toronto city councillor for Ward 19, Beaches—East York.</description><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/</link><language>en-CA</language><item><title>Misleading: Bradford says families are &quot;counting the minutes&quot; waiting for 911. That wait was cut in half two years ago.</title><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/1000-officers-pledge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/1000-officers-pledge/</guid><description>The 911 delays Bradford invokes were real in 2023 and have since been halved, from 26.7 minutes to 12.6, under the approach he calls the status quo. The chart he published to prove Toronto is understaffed starts its axis at 150, drawing a 22% gap as a 70% one. His underlying staffing numbers check out; the case he builds on them points the other way.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>policing</category><category>budget</category><category>election-2026</category></item><item><title>True: Bradford says Chow&apos;s letter to the Prime Minister never mentioned crime. We read all four pages. He&apos;s right.</title><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/chow-carney-letter-public-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/chow-carney-letter-public-safety/</guid><description>The letter runs four pages across four headed sections — affordable homes, transit, a fair fiscal deal for Toronto, and rising costs. It contains no reference to bail reform, bail compliance, auto theft, organized crime, policing, or community safety. Bradford&apos;s description of the document is accurate.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>policing</category><category>election-2026</category><category>housing</category></item><item><title>False: Bradford says Chow declined every chance to act on public safety. Eight weeks earlier, he was criticising her safety plan.</title><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/chow-every-chance-public-safety/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/chow-every-chance-public-safety/</guid><description>&quot;Every chance&quot; is a universal claim, and the record refutes it: a transit safety plan, a police hiring plan Bradford cites approvingly elsewhere, two budgets that funded it, a citywide crisis-response service, and 911 response times cut by more than half. On 28 May he attacked one of those plans for neglecting Scarborough — an argument about how Chow acted, which is only available if she acted.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>policing</category><category>election-2026</category><category>transit</category></item><item><title>Missing Context: Bradford did vote for an island airport referendum. He mentioned it 64 minutes after the fight was over.</title><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/island-airport-referendum-vote/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/island-airport-referendum-vote/</guid><description>The vote happened exactly as described. On 21 May, Bradford was one of nine councillors who voted for a referendum on the island airport, and he voted to let the motion be debated at all. But the clarity he claims consists of that vote and, as far as the public record shows, nothing else — and he first mentioned it 64 minutes after the federal government killed the expansion.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>waterfront</category><category>election-2026</category></item><item><title>Unsubstantiated: Bradford says Toronto trains officers and loses them to better-staffed forces. The service&apos;s own budget says they&apos;re retiring.</title><link>https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/officers-lost-to-other-forces/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://bradfordfacts.ca/fact-check/officers-lost-to-other-forces/</guid><description>TPS attributes its rising separations to a demographic bulge: officers hired in the mid-1990s, after the hiring freezes of the late 1980s, reaching retirement age now. Neither the 2025 nor the 2026 budget notes mention other police services at all, and 2025 separations came in below forecast. Officers may well leave for other forces — but nothing published shows it happening at a rate worth building a policy on.</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>policing</category><category>budget</category><category>election-2026</category></item></channel></rss>